Halacha for Sunday 8 Sivan 5780 May 31 2020

One Who Strikes Another- An Incident Regarding Harav Shteinman zt”l

Question: Is it correct that one who strikes one’s friend cannot be part of a Minyan, even after one has repented?

Answer: The Gemara (Sanhedrin 58b) states that one who strikes one’s friend is considered “wicked”. Striking another is a terribly grave sin.

The Rama writes in his gloss on Shulchan Aruch Choshen Mishpat (Chapter 420, Section 1), as follows: Some say that an ancient excommunication takes effect upon one who strikes one’s friend and it must be annulled for one to be able to join a Minyan.”

This means that striking another is so egregious that our Sages imposed an excommunication on one who does so, the most notable repercussion of which is that one may not join as part of a Minyan in the synagogue.

If the striker wishes to stand before a rabbinical court so that they may analyze his actions, the Rama (ibid.) writes that they annul the excommunication immediately. This means that when one accepts the laws of the Torah, his ban should be annulled and he should immediately be permitted to join a Minyan. This is even true if the party who was hit does not agree to this. Indeed, many great Poskim concur, including Hagaon Rabbeinu Chaim Benbenisti in his Kenesset Ha’Gedolah (Notes on Tur ibid, Section 12 and in his Responsa Ba’eh Chayeh, Volume 1, Chapter 235) and the Aruch Ha’Shulchan (ibid, Section 2).

Our dear friend, Hagaon Rabbi Gad Yazdi Shlit”a was asked regarding whether or not this law applies to one who hit another on the back playfully, as is unfortunately quite common in many places. He replied that there are certain times when this is not even forbidden and one is certainly not excommunicated as a result of doing so, based on the words of the Rambam (Chapter 5 of Hilchot Chovel U’Mazik, Halacha 1).

Nonetheless, Rav Yazdi added that even with regards to someone who actually struck another in earnest, the saintly Ben Ish Hai writes in his Responsa Rav Pe’alim (Volume 2, Orach Chaim, end of Chapter 11) in the name of Hagaon Rabbeinu Chaim Palagi (in his Ruach Chaim, Yoreh De’ah, Chapter 334, Section 18) that if the striker does not accept the law of the Torah, his excommunication should not be annulled and he should not be joined in a Minyan although he was never formally excommunicated. Nevertheless, Hagaon Rabbeinu Yosef Haim adds: “This matter is quite common, however, and we have not observed the sages of the generation performing an annulment of excommunication to permit all those who have struck others to join a Minyan. Certainly then, the order of Annulment of Vows and Excommunications customarily performed before the month of Elul, then again on Erev Rosh Chodesh Elul, and finally on Erev Rosh Hashanah and Erev Yom Kippur will suffice for this matter and the panel intends for this to be the case as well. Moreover, this ancient excommunication regarding one who strikes another is completely unbeknownst to most people.”

Based on this, he concludes that if one repents, one may rely on the order of Annulment of Vows customarily recited on Erev Rosh Hashanah and Erev Yom Kippur and he may be joined as part of a Minyan. It goes without saying that one must appease the person one struck and request his forgiveness.

Furthermore, he writes that in a situation where this person goes up to serve as Chazzan and he cannot be prevented from doing so for whatever reason, the congregation may answer Amen to his blessings and prayers. (See Reponsa Chatam Sofer, Choshen Mishpat, Chapter 182 and Aruch Ha’Shulchan, ibid.)

When one requests forgiveness from the struck party, he should not act overly hard to appease, rather, he should be flexible and easy to forgive. This is certainly true if the one who struck him did not mean to do so in earnest.

The following incident occurred in the Yeshiva of Kefar Saba, where Hagaon Harav Aharon Yehuda Leib Shteinman zt”l served as Rosh Yeshiva. Once, a few minutes before the start of the daily Talmudic lecture, one of the young men stood outside the door of the classroom. Another student who wished to play a practical joke locked the door from the inside so that the boy on the outside could not enter. Soon thereafter though, the Rosh Yeshiva himself arrived a bit early to the classroom and wished to enter but the door was locked. The student outside the door whispered frantically to his friend, “Open quickly, Rav Aharon Leib is here!” The student who locked the door was convinced that he was lying in order to get him to open the door. The Rosh Yeshiva just stood there for several minutes along with his student, locked out of the classroom.

A few minutes later, the boy who locked the door began to wonder if it was really possible that the Rosh Yeshiva had truly arrived and was locked out of the room. He quickly unlocked the door. In order to avoid shaming the boy who played the practical joke, the Rosh Yeshiva quickly turned his head away so that he could not see who the culprit was. May his merit protect us all, Amen!

Ask the Rabbi


8 Halachot Most Popular

The Laws of Taking Haircuts During the “Three Weeks"

The Customary Prohibition of Haircuts As a result of the mourning observed during the “Three Weeks,” the Ashkenazi custom is to abstain from shaving and taking haircuts beginning from the Seventeenth of Tammuz until the Tenth of Av. The Sephardic Custom Nevertheless, the Sephardic c......

Read Halacha

Mourning Customs Observed During the “Three Weeks”

---------------------------------- By Popular Request: There is room for leniency regarding listening to music during the "Three Weeks" for those who are in isolation or quarantine in cases of need. This is especially true regarding young children and one must do one's utmost to lif......

Read Halacha

Eating Meat with Fish

Since we have discussed several laws related to eating meat and dairy in the previous days, let us now discuss some laws related to eating fish with either chicken or meat and other related laws. Fish Baked With Meat The Gemara in Masechet Pesachim (76b) states: “Regarding fish that was ba......

Read Halacha

The Prohibition to Eat Meat and Dairy on the Same Table

----------------------------- Correction: There was a typographical error at the end of yesterday's Halacha which stated that the prohibition to take haircuts and shave does not apply this year according to the Sephardic custom. Clearly, this is incorrect and all of the laws of the week durin......

Read Halacha


The Laws of Eating Meat and Dairy on the Same Table-Continued

In the previous Halacha we have explained that it is forbidden to eat dairy foods on a table on which meat foods are placed, for there is concern that the individual eating will taste some of the other foods on the table, thus having transgressed the grave prohibition of eating milk and meat togethe......

Read Halacha

The Laws of Glassware and Pyrex Regarding the Prohibition of Milk and Meat Mixtures-Continued

In the previous Halacha we have written that according to Maran Ha’Shulchan Aruch, glassware does not absorb any flavor from foods placed in it and thus, there is no prohibition to use a glass vessel for meat and then after it is washed well, to use it for dairy (although the Rama does rule st......

Read Halacha

Question: Must one designate two different sets of glassware for dairy and meat as one would with other utensils?

Question: Must one designate two different sets of glassware for dairy and meat as one would with other utensils? Answer: We have already established in the previous Halacha that one is obligated to designate two separate sets of dishes and flatware for dairy and meat, for dishes used with either......

Read Halacha

The “Shehecheyanu” Blessing on a New Garment

Question: When is the appropriate time to recite the “Shehecheyanu” blessing on a new garment, at the time of purchase or the first time one wears it? Similarly, must one recite this blessing for every new piece of clothing one purchases? Answer: The Mishnah (Berachot 54a) teaches us ......

Read Halacha