Halacha for Wednesday 15 Cheshvan 5779 October 24 2018

The Laws of Changing One’s Location Temporarily While Intending to Return

The primary laws of changing one’s location during a meal are that if leaves one’s house during a meal and goes to his friend’s house in the adjoining building, if one wishes to continue eating there, one must recite another blessing. We have discussed many details regarding this law. We have explained that this only applies when one eats foods that do not require one to return to the place they were eaten to recite the after-blessing, such as fruits and vegetables which do not require the “Boreh Nefashot” after-blessing to be recited in the place they were eaten; rather, one may recite it wherever one pleases. Thus, once one leaves the original place where one has eaten these foods, one’s meal has immediately concluded and one must recite another blessing before continuing to eat. However, if one eats a food for which one must return to the place where one has eaten in order to recite its after-blessing, such as bread with regards to Birkat Hamazon, since one is obligated to return to one’s original place in order to recite Birkat Hamazon, leaving this place does not constitute a conclusion of the meal and the meal is considered continuous wherever one goes and thus, one would not recite another blessing.

One Who is Forced to Leave One’s House as a Result of a Siren
A question was posed by a resident of the southern part of Israel who sat down to eat a bread meal with his family when, all of a sudden, a siren (usually signaling an oncoming rocket attack) sounded, at which point he and his family left the house and went down to the shelter in an adjacent building. Several minutes later when all was clear, the family went back up to their apartment and wished to continue eating. Must they recite another blessing before continuing to eat?

It seems that one is obligated to recite another blessing, for when we said that one need not recite another blessing when eating bread, this only applies when one is required to return to the place where he ate the bread originally in order to recite Birkat Hamazon and because of this, leaving this place is not considered a conclusion of the meal. However, this that one is obligated to return to the original place of eating in order to bless only applies if one left the original place intentionally; nevertheless, if one is forced to leave the place where one has eaten, such as in our scenario, Maran Ha’Shulchan Aruch (Chapter 184) rules that one need not return to the original place where one has eaten in order to recite Birkat Hamazon. Based on this, it would seem that although one has eaten bread, as long as one is forced to leave the place where one has eaten, one must recite another blessing before continuing to eat, for one is not obligated to return to one’s original place and one’s law will be equal to one who has eaten fruit and left the place where one has eaten in which case one is required to recite another blessing before one continues eating.

Maran Rabbeinu Ovadia Yosef zt”l’s Response Regarding this Matter
Since this matter unfortunately applies to many, we posed this question to Maran Rabbeinu Ovadia Yosef zt”l and he ruled that halachically speaking, when one returns to one’s original place, one need not recite another blessing. His reasoning is because this is similar to the words of the Ritba in his commentary on Masechet Sukkah (45b) where he writes as follows: “Similarly, regarding blessings of enjoyment, if one left the meal with the intention of returning immediately, one does not require another blessing (or an after-blessing for what one has already eaten) since he has returned to his established meal.” We see from the words of the Ritba that although we usually say that any leaving from the location of the meal constitutes a conclusion of the meal, this only applies if one leaves without the intention of returning to the place where one has eaten. However, if one leaves for a short period of time and intends to return to one’s meal, one’s leaving does not constitute a conclusion of the meal and the original blessing which one has recited at the beginning of the meal still exempts one from reciting the blessing again.

We can infer from here regarding our case that if one is forced to leave the place where one is eating in order to seek shelter from the incoming rockets, since one intends to return immediately and continue one’s meal and especially since one is not leaving willingly, one need not recite another blessing upon one’s return home when continuing one’s meal.

This is a great opportunity to point out that in spite of Maran zt”l’s greatness and holiness, he would lower himself to the rest of the nation and would constantly inquire about the status and accomplishments of “Halacha Yomit” on the internet. He would guide us and request that we address many pertinent issues through the “Halacha Yomit” forum. Although these technological advancements were completely foreign to Maran zt”l, he would nevertheless encourage us to disseminate Torah in this matter so as to utilize this tool to spread the word of Hashem and to bring merit to the public.

Ask the Rabbi


8 Halachot Most Popular

One Who Eats Less than a Kezayit of Bread With other Foods- The Halachic Pitfall Present in Some Halls

In the previous Halacha we have explained that one does not recite a blessing on foods eaten during a bread meal, for the “Hamotzi Lechem Min Ha’aretz” blessing recited on the bread exempts them. We have also quoted the words of the Ritba who explains that this is not because of......

Read Halacha

Tu Bishvat Customs

Tonight, Sunday night, marks Tu Bishvat. There are unique customs observed on the night of Tu Bishvat, as we shall explain. The Prohibition of Fasting and the Customary Reading of the Zohar It is forbidden to fast on the day of Tu Bishvat. Some customarily hold an order of learning on the eve of......

Read Halacha

Mentioning Hashem’s Name in Invitations and Letters

Question: Is one permitted to write “ב"ה” (acronym for “Be’ezrat Hashem”) at the top of letters, adorn wedding invitations with verses, and the like or should one not do so out of concern that they may be thrown out into the waste basket, causing disgrace to Hashem......

Read Halacha

Eye Ailments on Shabbat

Our Sages teach us in the Gemara in Masechet Avodah Zarah (28b): “A man’s eyes are connected to his heart.” Thus, if we see that one’s eye is in danger, it is tantamount to revealing an ailment in the person’s heart and we must certainly rush to desecrate Shabbat in ord......

Read Halacha


Some Detailed Laws Regarding a Person Suffering from a Life-Threatening Condition on Shabbat

In the previous Halachot we have discussed that there is a Mitzvah to desecrate Shabbat for one whose life is in danger such as to transport him to the hospital, turn on a light in order to afford him proper treatment, and the like. We shall now discuss some details about this matter, based on what ......

Read Halacha

One Whose Life is in Danger on Shabbat

If one experiences a life-threatening situation or illness, there is a Torah obligation to desecrate the Shabbat on his behalf, for instance, by rushing him to the hospital by car; indeed, there is a Mitzvah to perform any other forbidden work on Shabbat that is necessary to save the individual&rsqu......

Read Halacha

The Blessing on Puffed Wheat and Farina

Question: We would like to partake of all of the Seven Species on Tu Bishvat. We wished to use puffed wheat as one of the species. What is the correct blessing on puffed wheat? Answer: Anything made out of the five types of grain (wheat, barley, oat, spelt, and rye) such as, cakes, cookies, and o......

Read Halacha

Rice Cakes and Puffed Rice Cereal

In the previous Halacha we have discussed that any grain, such as wheat, which is eaten raw requires the “Boreh Peri Ha’adama” blessing. For this reason, the blessing for puffed wheat is “Boreh Peri Ha’adama.” Only if the grains were cooked together until they sti......

Read Halacha