Halacha for Thursday 2 Elul 5777 August 24 2017

Rectifying the Transgression of a Positive Commandment and a Blessing in Vain

Question: If one has one’s Tefillin checked and the inspection reveals that unfortunately, a word was missing from the head Tefillin (which constitutes an absolute invalidation of the Tefillin) and after obviously switching Tefillin immediately, the individual’s heart is still bitter about the past and he would like to know: What rectification process can he perform to atone for this sin?

Answer: Maran Rabbeinu Ovadia Yosef zt”l was asked this question in his work (Chazon Ovadia-Yamim Nora’im, page 26) and writes that there are two issues which must be addressed: Firstly, is the fact that this person did not don the head Tefillin for several years. Secondly is the fact that he would recite a daily blessing in vain on the Tefillin (for the inquiring individual was Ashkenazi and Ashkenazim customarily recite a separate blessing before donning the head Tefillin), for one may not recite a blessing on invalid Tefillin and one who does so recites a blessing in vain, which is a Torah prohibition according to the Rambam.

We must first establish that the person asking this question is halachically classified as “unintentional,” i.e. there are three categories regarding any action: “Intentional,” one who performs a premeditated action, for instance, one who drives a car on Shabbat and knows that it is forbidden to do so, “unintentional,” one who performs an action unintentionally, for instance, one who drives a car on Shabbat and does not know that that day is Shabbat and the like, and “forced,” one who performs an action by force, for instance, one who drives a car on Shabbat while being forced to do so by others. Regarding one who is forced, such an individual is completely exempt, for he is not held responsible for his actions. One who performs an action intentionally bears complete responsibility for his actions. However, one who performs an action unintentionally cannot be considered as severe as one who did so intentionally, for he did not intend to do what he did. On the other hand, he cannot exempt himself completely as if he was forced, for if he would have been more careful, he would not have transgressed what he did.

Returning to our question, regarding the fact that the inquirer has not donned Tefillin, he seemingly would not have to undergo any special rectification process, for regarding transgressing a positive commandment (donning Tefillin is a positive Torah commandment and failing to don them constitutes a negation of a positive commandment), the Gemara (Yoma 86a) tells us, “If one transgresses a positive commandment and repents, he is immediately forgiven.” The Rambam rules likewise. Since this inquirer feels remorse for his sin, admits it, and accepts upon himself to take care not to transgress it again in the future, his sin is atoned for.

The only thing left to address is all the blessings in vain he would recite every day upon donning these invalid Tefillin. If we were to consider it as though he has transgressed an actual negative Torah prohibition, for he has uttered the name of Hashem in vain and transgressed the verse, “Do not bear the name of Hashem, your G-d, in vain,” the Gemara (Yoma 86a) tells us that repentance does not atone for such things completely; rather, only through Yom Kippur can his sin be completely forgiven. Thus, he must pray fervently that Hashem accept his repentance in the merit of the holiest of days.

Nevertheless, Maran zt”l writes that since according to many Rishonim the prohibition of reciting a blessing in vain is not a Torah prohibition, rather, it is only Rabbinic in nature, in any case there is no special requirement for his rectification process and a regular repentance will suffice (although in practice we are careful regarding blessings in vain in accordance with the view of the Rambam who writes that it is indeed a Torah prohibition). Maran zt”l adds that since he has transgressed uttering Hashem’s name in vain unintentionally, there are those that say that even if one transgresses a negative Torah commandment unintentionally that he needs no special atonement and only when performing such a sin intentionally will one need great mercy to be forgiven through Yom Kippur.

Thus, Maran zt”l ruled that a regular repentance was sufficient for this young Torah scholar and Hashem would forgive him for his iniquity.

We see clearly how much one should be careful not to recite blessings in vain in a negligent manner, for this is considered uttering Hashem’s name in vain intentionally and repentance for this is difficult. One should strengthen his observance of this matter by paying close attention before reciting any blessing out of one’s mouth. May Hashem see our suffering and accept our prayers mercifully and willingly.

Ask the Rabbi

8 Halachot Most Popular

The Laws of Precedence Regarding Blessings (Continued)

In the previous Halacha we have explained that there are instances that priority is given to recite a blessing upon a certain food over another because of the innate significance of the given food, for instance, because it is a fruit that belongs to the Seven Species of fruits that the Land of Israe......

Read Halacha

The Month of Shevat and the Law that Food Must be in Front of the Individual While Reciting a Blessing

Next Wednesday (actually, beginning from next Tuesday night) will mark the Fifteenth of Shevat or Tu Bishvat. We will therefore begin a segment on the laws of Blessings of Enjoyment. In following Halachot we shall discuss some more laws pertaining to reciting blessings which we have discussed in the......

Read Halacha

Precedence Regarding the Order of Blessings (Continued)

Summary of the Laws Explained Thus Far In the previous Halachot we have explained that there is an order of priority regarding blessings, sometimes because of the innate importance of the food and sometimes due to the importance of the blessing. Priority of “Boreh Peri Ha’etz”......

Read Halacha

The Laws of the Blessing on Fruits

In the previous Halachot we have explained that there is an order of priority regarding blessings. Thus, if one wishes to partake of apples and dates, one must recite the blessing on the dates, for they are one of the Seven Species. Precedence Regarding Blessing-Only Preferable Maran Ha’Be......

Read Halacha

Question: Is one permitted to act stringently in any situation one pleases?

Answer: In the previous Halacha we have discussed that one must wait six hours between eating meat and cheese in accordance with the ruling of Maran Ha’Shulchan Aruch. This law is based on a Gemara in Masechet Chullin (105a). For the purpose of our discussion, we shall quote the words of the G......

Read Halacha

Eating Meat Dishes after Dairy Foods

In the previous Halachot, we have discussed the laws of eating dairy foods after meat. We have explained that one must wait six hours between eating the respective foods. We shall now discuss the laws of eating meat dishes after dairy foods. The Opinion of the Gemara which Permits Eating Meat aft......

Read Halacha

Some Detailed Laws Regarding Eating Cheese after Meat

In the previous Halachot we have mentioned that after eating meat, one must wait six hours before eating dairy products. A Woman who has Given Birth or is Nursing A woman who is within thirty days of having given birth may eat dairy products after eating meat and she need not wait six hours. It ......

Read Halacha

Eating Dairy Items after Eating Poultry

In the previous Halacha we have discussed in general the law that one must wait six hours after eating meat before eating dairy foods either because the nature of meat is to get stuck between one’s teeth or because meat gives off a taste in one’s mouth for a prolonged amount of time. ......

Read Halacha