Halacha for Wednesday 11 Tammuz 5777 July 5 2017

Uprooting a Fruit Tree in Order to Build a House

In the previous Halachot we have explained that the Torah prohibits uprooting a fruit-bearing tree, such as a palm tree or a grapevine. We have also discussed several situations where it is permissible to uproot a fruit tree, for instance, when the actual wood of the tree is worth more than the fruits it produces, in which case it is permissible to uproot the tree in order to sell its wood, as this is not considered a “destructive manner.”

Uprooting a Tree in Order to Build a House
The Rosh writes that if one needs the place of the tree, for example, if the tree is planted in a place where one would like to build a structure, it seems that it will be permissible to cut it down. Rabbeinu Yerocham (Netiv 32, Part 2, page 94d) writes likewise: “One may not cut down one’s own trees; however, if one needs their place, this is permissible.” Maran Rabbeinu Ovadia Yosef zt”l writes in his Yabia Omer (Volume 5, Yoreh De’ah, Chapter 12) that it seems from their words that even if the tree will be completely destroyed by uprooting it to use its place, there is nevertheless no prohibition to do so since this is not being done in a destructive manner. The opinion of the Rosh and Rabbeinu Yerocham thus seems quite novel, for the Gemara says it is permissible to cut down a tree only when its wood can be sold for a high price and is thus not being “destroyed,” whereas the Rosh and Rabbeinu Yerocham rule leniently and allow cutting down the tree even when it is being completely destroyed, merely because its space is needed, for the bottom line is that this is not a being done in a “destructive manner.”

However, several Acharonim disagree with the opinion of the Rosh, including the author of the Sefer Bet Yaakov, and they support their opinion with proofs. However, halachically speaking, Maran Ha’Chida rebuffs all of the proofs set forth by the author of Bet Yaakov and rules that when it is necessary to extend one’s house due to the space being too tight for those residing in it, one may cut down a tree that is in that space and there is no prohibition to do so whatsoever. Nevertheless, when one extends one’s house merely for aesthetic and leisurely purposes and not because it is truly necessary, one should not be lenient to cut down a tree for this purpose, for only regarding a non-fruit-bearing tree is there no prohibition to uproot it as long as there is some sort of benefit; however, regarding a fruit-bearing tree, one may only uproot it in a case of great need. He quotes this law in the name of several great Poskim.

Danger Posed by Uprooting Fruit Trees
Until now, we have only dealt with this matter from a halachic perspective. However, Hagaon Harav Yaakov Emdin in his Responsa She’elat Ya’abetz writes that even in a situation where it is halachically permissible to cut done a fruit tree, there is still a danger involved in doing so. He brings a proof from the words of Rabbi Chanina in the Gemara (Baba Kama, 91b) who said that his son by the name of Shivchat, who was a truly righteous man in every sense, passed away at a young age. His father, Rabbi Chanina, could find no other reason for this to happen than because he cut down a young fig tree. Certainly, he did so in a halachically acceptable manner and nevertheless, he still passed away at a young age as a result. Based on this, we see that there is a danger involved in cutting down a fruit tree, “For a man is like a tree of the field.” In any case, it is not a pious act to cut down a fruit tree even in a permissible fashion.

Although there are some authorities who disagree with the stance of Hagaon Ya’abetz and write that there is no prohibition or danger involved in this matter, nevertheless, we find that in the will of Rabbeinu Yehuda Ha’Chassid, he writes that one should not cut down a fruit-bearing tree. We must understand his words to include even a situation where one is doing so in a permissible fashion. It is well-known that the Poskim disagree on whether or not one must be concerned with what Rabbeinu Yehuda Ha’Chassid wrote in his will, as we shall, G-d-willing, speak about on another occasion. Thus, halachically speaking, although Maran zt”l rules that one may cut down a fruit tree in order to build a house where the necessity is great, nevertheless, it is proper to do so by hiring a non-Jew to uproot the trees as opposed to doing so himself.

Ask the Rabbi


8 Halachot Most Popular

The Laws of Precedence Regarding Blessings (Continued)

In the previous Halacha we have explained that there are instances that priority is given to recite a blessing upon a certain food over another because of the innate significance of the given food, for instance, because it is a fruit that belongs to the Seven Species of fruits that the Land of Israe......

Read Halacha

The Month of Shevat and the Law that Food Must be in Front of the Individual While Reciting a Blessing

Next Wednesday (actually, beginning from next Tuesday night) will mark the Fifteenth of Shevat or Tu Bishvat. We will therefore begin a segment on the laws of Blessings of Enjoyment. In following Halachot we shall discuss some more laws pertaining to reciting blessings which we have discussed in the......

Read Halacha

Precedence Regarding the Order of Blessings (Continued)

Summary of the Laws Explained Thus Far In the previous Halachot we have explained that there is an order of priority regarding blessings, sometimes because of the innate importance of the food and sometimes due to the importance of the blessing. Priority of “Boreh Peri Ha’etz”......

Read Halacha

The Laws of the Blessing on Fruits

In the previous Halachot we have explained that there is an order of priority regarding blessings. Thus, if one wishes to partake of apples and dates, one must recite the blessing on the dates, for they are one of the Seven Species. Precedence Regarding Blessing-Only Preferable Maran Ha’Be......

Read Halacha


Question: Is one permitted to act stringently in any situation one pleases?

Answer: In the previous Halacha we have discussed that one must wait six hours between eating meat and cheese in accordance with the ruling of Maran Ha’Shulchan Aruch. This law is based on a Gemara in Masechet Chullin (105a). For the purpose of our discussion, we shall quote the words of the G......

Read Halacha

Eating Meat Dishes after Dairy Foods

In the previous Halachot, we have discussed the laws of eating dairy foods after meat. We have explained that one must wait six hours between eating the respective foods. We shall now discuss the laws of eating meat dishes after dairy foods. The Opinion of the Gemara which Permits Eating Meat aft......

Read Halacha

Some Detailed Laws Regarding Eating Cheese after Meat

In the previous Halachot we have mentioned that after eating meat, one must wait six hours before eating dairy products. A Woman who has Given Birth or is Nursing A woman who is within thirty days of having given birth may eat dairy products after eating meat and she need not wait six hours. It ......

Read Halacha

Eating Dairy Items after Eating Poultry

In the previous Halacha we have discussed in general the law that one must wait six hours after eating meat before eating dairy foods either because the nature of meat is to get stuck between one’s teeth or because meat gives off a taste in one’s mouth for a prolonged amount of time. ......

Read Halacha