Halacha for Wednesday 18 Elul 5779 September 18 2019

A Thief Who Wishes to Repent-Continued

In the previous Halacha, we discussed the enactment of our Sages which dictates that when a thief comes to return a stolen object, one must refuse to accept it so that thieves do not become disheartened from repenting. Nevertheless, there are several details associated with this law, as we shall now discuss.

The Words of Maran Ha’Shulchan Aruch
Maran Ha’Shulchan Aruch (Choshen Mishpat, Chapter 366) states: “If a notorious thief comes to repent on his own and the stolen object is no longer accessible, the owner may not accept reimbursement from him so that he will not hold back from repenting. However, if the thief wants to fulfill his Heavenly obligation and return it, we do not protest if the owner accepts it.” We will now explain the words of Maran.

A “Notorious Thief”
First of all, when Maran refers to a “notorious thief,” he means to say that the edict not to accept the stolen object only applies to a thief who is infamous in his robberies. However, if the thief is not one by profession, rather, he happened to have stolen once or twice, the owner may in fact accept repayment from him, for his Teshuva (repentance) process is not as difficult since he can easily come up with the money to reimburse the few people he stole from.

The source of this law lies in the words of the Tosafot who quote Rabbeinu Yitzchak Ba’al Ha’Tosafot as saying that the ruling of our Sages not to accept the stolen object only applies to a well-known thief because it is difficult for him to part with his assets so the Sages opened the pathways of repentance for him. However, the owner may accept reimbursement from one who has stolen only occasionally.

Repenting on His Own
Furthermore, when Maran refers to a thief “who comes to repent on his own,” he means that only when the thief comes to return what he stole from his own good will do we not accept it from him. However, if the thief shows no signs of repentance for his evil ways and the owner is able to extract reimbursement from him through Bet Din (Rabbinical Court) and the like, our Sages never enacted not to accept it from him, for the entire enactment was only for a thief who repents by his own initiative while this thief is not repentant at all. The Rosh (Rabbeinu Asher bar Yechiel, father of the Tur) writes this in his commentary and adds that we find in many places in the Talmud that Rabbinical judges forced defendants to reimburse the owner for stolen objects and this is per the letter of Torah law. Only in situations similar to the story above, where the thief offers repayment on his own accord, must the owner refuse to accept reimbursement.

When the Stolen Object is No Longer Accessible
When Maran writes, “If the stolen object is no longer accessible”, this means that the Sages only established not to accept repayment from the thief when the actual stolen object is no longer in his possession. For instance, if someone stole an electronic device and the like and the device is still in the thief’s possession, he must surely return it to its owner and the owner may accept it, for the enactment of our Sages does not apply here. However, if the device is no longer in his possession, for instance, because the thief sold it or lost it and now the thief would like to repay its value to the owner, the owner should not accept repayment. This detail is delineated explicitly in the above Gemara: “Rav Nachman says, they [the Sages] only established this when the stolen object is no longer in his possession.”

If the Thief Wishes to Repay the Stolen Object’s Value in any Event
Finally, when Maran writes that if the thief wishes to fulfill his Heavenly obligation and return its worth, the owner may accept it, this means that if the owner has already told the thief that he absolves him of his obligation to pay and he is no longer responsible for repayment and the thief insists that the owner accept reimbursement, the owner may accept it. This is similar to the law of a loan canceled by Shemita that in such a situation, a lender may accept repayment of a loan canceled by Shemita.

Summary: If a thief comes, of his own good will, to repay the value of an object he stole from a given individual and he is a person who was a thief by profession and the actual stolen object is no longer in his possession, the owner must not accept this thief’s reimbursement. If after being informed that the owner absolves him from reimbursing him the thief nonetheless insists that the owner accept reimbursement, the owner may, in fact, accept it.

Ask the Rabbi


8 Halachot Most Popular

COMO RETRACTARSE DE LAS CALUMNIAS HABLADAS

Pregunta: Es necesario, para poder retractarse correctamente, acercarse a la persona que se criticó –sobre la que se habló “lashon hara”- para aclararle lo que habló de él? Por otro lado, el rabino que dictaminó en forma rigurosa, prohibió ......

Read Halacha

ORDEN RITUAL DE LA NOCHE DE ROSH HASHANA

Las dos noches de Rosh Hashana es costumbre comer alimentos que simbolizan buenos designios para Israel. Por ello se come Rubia o lubia en árabe, zapallo –calabaza dulce-, dátiles, acelga, puerro, cabeza de cordero, manzana y miel. Ya hemos escrito oportunamente, que la perso......

Read Halacha

ENCENDIDO DE VELAS EN ROSH HASHANA

El primer día de Rosh Hashana es costumbre encender las luminarias del Yom Tob –festividad- antes de la caída del sol, como se lo hace en la víspera de Shabbat. De todas formas, si no se encendieron las luminarias en la víspera de la festividad, podrá la muje......

Read Halacha

PORMENORES DE LA PLEGARIA DE ROSH HASHANA

Obviamente, las plegarias de Rosh Hashana son pronunciadas desde un “majzor” o libro de plegarias en los cuales encontramos distintos textos y semánticas, según la costumbre de cada comunidad. Sin embargo, debido a la inquietud que cada año nos hacen llegar sobre alg......

Read Halacha


SOBRE EL LLANTO EN ROSH HASHANA

Pregunta: Se puede llorar en Rosh Hashan en las plegarias para invocar la misericordia divina? O acaso es preferible desarrollar las plegarias con alegría? Respuesta: Analizaron las autoridades rabínicas si en el día de Rosh Hashana es asimismo un precepto alegrarse al igual ......

Read Halacha

EL HOMBRE CONSIDERARSE MEDIO INOCENTE Y MEDIO CULPABLE

El Talmud (Kiddushin 40) nos dice: El hombre debe verse a si mismo como medio culpable y medio inocente, si observa un precepto, dichoso de él, pues inclina su balanza hacia la inocencia, pero si comete un pecado, pobre de él, pues la inclina hacia su condena. Esto significa, que la......

Read Halacha

SONIDOS DEL SHOFAR

Es un precepto de la Torá oír el sonido del shofar el día de Rosh Hashana, como está escrito: Día de Teruá -sonido del shofar-será para ustedes. Por lo tanto a partir de que se ha recitado la bendición sobre dicho sonido u oído la misma ......

Read Halacha

PREPARATIVOS PARA ROSH HASHANA

En los días previos a Rosh Hashana, cada quien debe realizar una reflexión personal para determinar qué aspectos de la conducta individual se deben corregir y esto mismo servirá como argumento de ayuda en el día del juicio de R.H. Explicó nuestro maestro ......

Read Halacha